![]() The upgrade to 3.18 went perfectly smoothly. We updated that installation to 3.17 when we looked at Haiku, and now we've dug the machine out and updated it again. Although it's not as fast as Haiku, it's by far the leanest and quickest Linux distro we've tried on that machine. Although we don't use that machine a lot, Alpine even survived being shrunk and set to dual-boot, which is not something it supports out of the box. When we looked at Beta 4 of the Haiku OS, we used the same machine: a 2008 Thinkpad W500, with a Core 2 Duo, and maxed out with 8GB of RAM. On the other hand, if you're deploying containers on top, it makes less difference, and if it does what you need, using the much smaller Alpine image could save you a lot of space.Īs we said last year, The Reg FOSS desk rather likes Alpine. If you're building containers, there are lots of good reasons to use Ubuntu – it's familiar to lots more people because it's the most widely used distro, with an estimated third of the Linux market. Sick of GNOME, Snap and Flatpak? You might like Linux Lite, but beware rough edges. ![]() When it comes to Linux distros, one person's molehill is another's mountain.Ubuntu 23.04 welcomes three more flavors, but hamburger menus leave a bad taste.An unexpectedly fresh blast from the past, Freespire 9.5 has landed.At the time of writing, the minimal Ubuntu 22.04 image is just under 30MB, while the Alpine one is 3.24MB – well under the 5MB they claim. The result is a significant size difference. For example, to go by JFrog's comparison, the default Ubuntu image contains nearly 300 utilities, while Alpine has well under 100, mostly provided by one binary: busybox. That is quite substantial, although to be fair, the Docker Ubuntu image also has more than a billion downloads. Docker's Alpine container image has been downloaded over a billion times.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |